Skip to main content

How Does Amazon’s Kindle Fire Compare To The iPad? [Review]


Early reviews of Amazon’s Kindle Fire haven’t been kind, but I like the device. It’s a versatile and enjoyable little media tablet.
It doesn’t pretend to be anything it’s not (a general-purpose tab), and though not as polished as Apple’s products, its a good first try.
The trouble is that everyone is comparing the Kindle Fire to the iPad, and it will always come up short. The Kindle Fire is actually closer to the iPod touch, but it’s not that either. It’s a well-made, well-designed window into Amazon’s media ecosystem, and on that score, it succeeds very well.
The problem most reviewers have with the Fire, it seems, is that it’s no iPad. It won’t run a million apps, take photos, videoconference, or be used to create content. It doesn’t have a camera, GPS, or a 3G cellular connection. It’s 7-inch screen is too small. It doesn’t have a hardware Home button or even volume-control buttons.
What it is, is a compact black plastic-and-glass slate that’s chunkier and heftier than you’d expect. The soft rubbery back feels nice to the touch and it’s much easier to hold for bedtime reading than an iPad. It can almost be stuffed into a jacket pocket for a trip to the coffee shop (if you have big pockets).
The Good:
It’s $199 — less than half the price of the cheapest iPad.
The 7-inch screen is bright and sharp — It has almost the same resolution as the iPad 2 (1024 x 600 – compared to 1024 x 768). Although some have complained the screen is fuzzy, to my eyes it’s sharper than the iPad 2. I loaded up several websites and a book to cross-compare, and text looked much sharper on the Kindle Fire.
Great for reading in bed — And I like that the Kindle app runs on my iPad, iPhone, MacBook Air and iMac, so I can read any eBook I purchase from Amazon anywhere. That’s something Apple needs to do with iBooks.
Easy set-up — Setting up Gmail, Facebook and Netflix was a breeze.
Performance — Early reviewers complained that the Fire was sluggish, and the Silk browser horribly slow for surfing the Web. Maybe they got a pre-release version of the Fire software or Amazonquickly fixed performance issues. As soon as I connected my Fire to the internet during setup, it downloaded a software update. I haven’t had any performance issues with the Fire. It’s not as a fast or as a responsive as the iPad 2, and there are occasional hangups, but it’s not painfully slow.
Navigation — Getting around is via Home and Back bottoms — both software buttons. The Back button is inter-modal. It applies to web pages in the browser but also jumping around between apps, like a universal undo. It’s an intuitive and familiar navigation scheme, and I find it dead easy to use.
Preloaded account — The Fire was preloaded with my Amazon account, and all the digital content I’ve ever purchased from Amazon was already linked to the device (but not downloaded). Everything was neatly arranged in the appropriate tab in the Fire’s media browser — books, video and music. This arrangement is actually easier to navigate than the iPad’s content navigation, which is split across several apps.
Amazon Prime — If you have an Amazon Prime account (I do) then the Kindle Fire is pretty cool. Paying $80 for a year’s worth of Amazon Prime is cheaper than paying for Netflix and you get a lot of extra awesomeness other than just streaming Amazon Prime Video. The lending library is great for voracious readers who are cheap like me and doesn’t like buying new stuff all the time.
Cloud integration and streaming — Digital content can either be downloaded onto the device or streamed from the cloud. Some have complained that the Fire’s 8-Gbytes of storage is too skimpy, but if you’re streaming most content, you don’t need it. Because I have a sad life, I’m rarely far from a Wi-Fi connection. The only time I need to load content is before a trip, and 8-Gbytes should be plenty for a couple of movies and some playlists. The process of managing downloads or streaming is dead easy. It actually puts Apple to shame with the hoops you sometimes have to jump through loading and deleting content through iTunes.
Silk browser — There’s been tons of complaints about Amazon’s Silk browser, which has been eviscerated for being slow and buggy. I haven’t encountered any such problems. In my experience, it’s a pretty good browser. It’s not the fastest, but it renders pages well and quickly. It supports all the features expected in a modern browser — tabs, bookmarks, stored passwords, etc. It also supports Flash, which many people will consider a curse, not a blessing (it’s easily turned off though). Amazonsays it also preloads pages and promises to get faster as it learns what sites are popular with Fire users. Some have discovered that browsing is quicker with this feature turned off.
You can install unsanctioned apps — Like Apple’s devices, the Fire is only supposed to run apps sanctioned by the parent company. The Amazon app store is anemic, which should change over time, but it’s actually dead easy to install unsanctioned apps. Go to Settings>Device and turn on “Allow Installation of Applications From Unknown Sources.” I was able to install Spotify, the streaming music service, where I have a premium account. I can now stream Spotify to the device even though Spotify isn’t yet available in Amazon’s app store and may never be. (Set up, btw, was dead easy and it works flawlessly.)
Easy to charge — No proprietary dock connectors here. The Fire charges via micro USB, which is becoming the universal standard (mandated in Europe). Around the house, I charge it up using the kids’ cellphones chargers.
The packaging — The Fire comes in a simple cardboard box that’s completely recyclable except for the plastic sleeve than encases the device. Apple’s packaging sometimes irritates me with its preciousness. Jeff Bezos, on the other hand, is refreshingly straightforward and utilitarian.
The Bad:
Responsiveness — The Fire is nowhere near as responsive as the iPad. Where the iPad always recognizes a touch or swipe, the Fire sometimes has to be handled with kid gloves. You have to slowly and deliberately hit a button front and central for the touch to register.
Power button placement — For some inexplicable reason, the power button is on the bottom between the speakers. It’s a strange place to put it, because when you keep hitting it when using the device and putting it to sleep.
Games — This is where the Fire really falls short on the iPod touch, a game-console par excellence. I can’t see kids clamoring for the Kindle Fire over the iPod touch.
Volume control buttons — It really needs hardware volume-control buttons. To change the volume, you have to exit any app you’re using and go into the system settings. It’s way too painful when watching a movie or web video.
Wi-Fi only — Amazon already offers Kindles which have free cell connections, the cost of which is built into the price of eBooks and online magazine subscriptions accessed through the device. It would be much harder for Amazon to offer the Fire with a similar subsidy, but no doubt Amazon is working on 3G models. Stay tuned for version 2.
Verdict:
The Fire is no iPad killer, but it is the first Android version of the iPod Touch. It’s the first device that fulfills similar functions without a cellular contract — and at a lower price.
You don’t create anything on a Kindle, you simply consume. It’s not even really a tablet because it’s so small. It’s just a really great eBook reader, but that’s not a bad thing. For $200, it’s great for people who want to save money and don’t need all the features of an iPad.
Rating: ★★★★☆ 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ipad apps: AppStart Review

AppStart For iPad Review Free for a limited time only , AppStart for iPad is a terrific app by the folks over at  AppAdvice.com  that’s meant to serve as a starter guide for new iPad users and owners. The promotion is only available for a limited time as customers flock to pick up their iPad 2s this week. Whether you’ve had your iPad since launch day or you just picked one up, AppStart For iPad is a detailed and comprehensive guide for the most popular and useful ways to utilize your iPad in addition to recommending a few apps to get your feet wet. When you first open the app, the home screen is displayed in a clean grid of buttons for you to tap-in and find out everything there is to do with the iPad. Each grid-box allows you to open up a mini-guide for how you can use your iPad as an eReader, home theater, radio, nightstand, magazine, or social media hub. Within each mini-guide, the folks over at App-Advice also throw in their suggestions for both free and paid apps that re...

Ipad 2 Accesories

Zagg have done it again and released what we are excited to say is the seasons MUST HAVE iPad accessory: The  ZAGGmate iPad case with keyboard . It’s not often that we get entirely blown away by an accessory for the iPad, but this one has left us shell shocked and in awe. The perfect compliment to your iPad, this is the first iPad keyboard case combo that we have seen yet that has done it right. In fact, it’s the best bluetooth keyboard we’ve seen to date as well! It’s so right and so perfect that we already wonder how we ever used our iPad without it! Check out the review below… ZAGGmate with Keyboard The iPad’s New Best Friend Our first impression of the ZAGGmate was: “Where’s the rest of it?” This iPad case is unlike anything else we’ve seen on the market to date and the designers at Zagg worked hard to literally rethink what an iPad case could be. This is an iPad case that doesn’t cover the whole iPad, but rather just covers the iPad’s screen, and leaves the back of the tablet...

Ipad 2 Apps: Skyfire Web browser Review

Ipad 2 Apps: Skyfire Web browser Review Skyfire for the iPad made headlines when it was first released, due to its ability to play Flash videos on a device previously void of this popular technology. Users flocked to the App Store, eager to drop five bucks for the chance to view their favorite clips, shows, and movies on their iPad. Not only did the browser play these videos, but the integrated video compression saved a significant amount of bandwidth for people on a restricted data plan. The initial excitement wore off quickly, though, as complaints were rampant about many sites not playing videos as expected. Since its inception Skyfire has certainly improved in this area, now claiming support for over 200,000 websites containing Flash. The dissenters will always be there as not every Flash video on the Web will be playable, even if the developers at Skype Labs remain diligent. Some of the backlash is warranted to a certain extent. If I paid $4.99 with the intent of viewi...